Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" for MySQL AB?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
Cc: Postgresql-General General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" for MySQL AB?
Date: 2006-02-15 20:43:04
Message-ID: 19390.1140036184@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> writes:
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/bdb-restrictions.html

> I especially like the third restriction. How on earth do people live
> with this software?

The preceding page is amusing too:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/bdb-todo.html

I find this important TODO item particularly telling:
* Change to use no page locks for table scanning operations.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but that sure sounds like they intend to
dumb down BDB so that it no longer works well in concurrent situations,
in order to save a few cycles in single-user scenarios. Have MySQL
officially abandoned the multi-user case to us?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2006-02-15 20:45:07 Re: I see this as the end of BDB in MySQL without a
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2006-02-15 20:35:35 Re: Postgres using 100% CPU