| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] DELETE ... USING |
| Date: | 2005-04-09 04:46:51 |
| Message-ID: | 19370.1113022011@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, the discussion earlier in the week concluded that
>> add_missing_from=true should emit a notice in every case where
>> add_missing_from=false would fail. Do you want to argue against
>> that conclusion?
> I didn't realize that "SELECT pg_class.*" was now going to fail because
> add_missing_from is false.
It always has, though. Neil hasn't changed the behavior when
add_missing_from is false ... he's only made add_missing_from=true
emit a notice in *every* case where add_missing_from=false would
fail.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-09 04:48:40 | Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-09 04:26:36 | Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-04-09 05:24:03 | Re: Minor fix in lwlock.c |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-09 04:18:53 | Re: [PATCHES] DELETE ... USING |