Re: Is pg_restore in 10.6 working?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David <dlbarron28(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is pg_restore in 10.6 working?
Date: 2018-11-12 21:06:26
Message-ID: 1937.1542056786@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/12/18 12:39 PM, David wrote:
>> I'm not following your question.  The pre-data and post-data sections
>> each go to an individual file, but the data section goes to a
>> directory.  I can restore the files using psql, but it is the restore
>> of the directory that is hanging.

The other bit that I think David is missing is that pg_dump's default
output format is a plain-text SQL script, which is meant to be fed to
psql not pg_restore. To get something that pg_restore can work with,
you need to specify one of the non-text dump formats (typically, you'd
use -Fc or -Fd).

The situation in which you'd want to use "pg_restore -f" is if you
want to reconstruct a plain-text SQL script from one of the non-text
dump formats, rather than just restoring directly into a database.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Sargent 2018-11-12 21:14:28 Re: Is pg_restore in 10.6 working?
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2018-11-12 21:00:49 Re: Is pg_restore in 10.6 working?