From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Longer startup delay (was Re: Single Index Tuple Chain (SITC) method) |
Date: | 2006-06-30 02:36:27 |
Message-ID: | 19357.1151634987@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Speaking of which, I think I've noticed a longer delay in server start
> after initdb. I haven't measured nor profiled it, but I think it may be
> because of the heap_inplace_update xlogging that we weren't doing
> previously.
Can't say that I've noticed anything like that. I have gotten a nagging
sense lately that there are strange delays happening at random times
during the regression tests. Like you I'm not quite sure about this,
but I run "make installcheck" often enough to be fairly attuned to it,
and it just seems like it's sometimes hanging up for a couple of seconds
for no apparent reason. OTOH we've stuck some new, slow queries into
the tests recently and maybe I just haven't acclimated to that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-30 03:25:16 | Re: Index corruption |
Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2006-06-30 02:14:19 | Re: Index corruption |