From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jie Liang <jie(at)stbernard(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Bruce Momjian '" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org '" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ineffiency of pg_restore |
Date: | 2002-08-12 22:38:26 |
Message-ID: | 19334.1029191906@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-bugs |
Jie Liang <jie(at)stbernard(dot)com> writes:
> pg_restore give admin a lot of flexabilities, it can restore any object
> from a single dump file. But if the table is very big, e.g. 2M records,
> it will take a long time to restore because it use INSERTs.
This is demonstrably not the case --- at least not by default. You
get the same commands you would've gotten from pg_dump. Sure you
didn't create the dump file with "-d" ?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Liang | 2002-08-12 22:48:23 | Re: ineffiency of pg_restore |
Previous Message | Jie Liang | 2002-08-12 22:30:06 | ineffiency of pg_restore |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Liang | 2002-08-12 22:48:23 | Re: ineffiency of pg_restore |
Previous Message | Jie Liang | 2002-08-12 22:30:06 | ineffiency of pg_restore |