Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Date: 2023-02-07 11:45:45
Message-ID: 1932eb97-7361-654e-fca5-817386f28306@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-02-06 Mo 23:43, Noah Misch wrote:
>>
>>> Well, we did talk about adding a pre-commit hook to the repository, with
>>> instructions for how to enable it. And I don't see a problem with adding the
>>> pre-receive we're discussing here to src/tools/something.
>> Yeah. I don't think we are seriously considering putting any restrictions
>> in place on gitmaster
> I could have sworn that was exactly what we were discussing, a pre-receive
> hook on gitmaster.
>

That's one idea that's been put forward, but it seems clear that some
people are nervous about it.

Maybe a better course would be to continue improving the toolset and get
more people comfortable with using it locally and then talk about
integrating it upstream.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2023-02-07 11:54:07 Re: Hi i am Intrested to contribute
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-02-07 11:19:50 Re: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot()