Re: shared memory corruption

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Todd Nemanich <todd(at)twopunks(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared memory corruption
Date: 2003-05-13 23:32:31
Message-ID: 19326.1052868751@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Todd Nemanich <todd(at)twopunks(dot)org> writes:
> PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.3.1): PostgreSQL-7.3.1
> Compiler used (example: gcc 2.95.2) : ? (PGDG 7.3.1
> rpms on RH 7.3)

> May 13 14:01:17 db3 postgres[2618]: [1] LOG: server process (pid 14721)
> was terminated by signal 6

Hmm. Signal 6 is SIGABORT, which suggests that that backend aborted
itself after detecting an Assert() failure. But I didn't think that
the RPM version was compiled with assertions enabled. Also, if it was
an assert then there should have been a complaint about it just before
the termination message.

If this is repeatable, I'd suggest restarting the postmaster under
"ulimit -c unlimited" so that the abort will produce a core-dump file.
A debugger backtrace from the core file would provide useful info.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herve Boulouis 2003-05-14 10:59:38 segfault in postmaster (pg 7.3.2 & FreeBSD)
Previous Message Todd Nemanich 2003-05-13 20:03:38 shared memory corruption