Re: Why hash indexes suck

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why hash indexes suck
Date: 2004-06-10 03:59:19
Message-ID: 19275.1086839959@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Added to TODO:
> * Order heap pointers on hash index pages by hash value and ctid

[blink] This seems to miss out on the actual point of the thread (hash
bucket size shouldn't be a disk page) in favor of an entirely
unsupported sub-suggestion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-10 04:05:59 Re: Why hash indexes suck
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-10 03:35:04 Re: Why hash indexes suck