Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Date: 2009-03-10 18:59:22
Message-ID: 1927.1236711562@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You're just putting the hard decision onto packagers, who have no more
>> knowledge than you do about what their users want, and (probably)
>> considerably less understanding of the benefits/risks of some new
>> configure option they happen to notice.

> Which is exactly why we have two types of RPMS, --integer-datetimes and
> not.

Maybe Devrim is doing that, but nobody else is. Debian went for
--integer-datetimes years ago, Red Hat stuck with floats. Nobody
is going to go to the trouble of maintaining two sets of RPMs, even
assuming they notice there's a choice.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-03-10 19:08:43 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2009-03-10 18:45:13 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)