| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error-safe user functions |
| Date: | 2022-12-02 14:12:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1925585.1669990324@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think the design is evolving in your head as you think about this
> more, which is totally understandable and actually very good. However,
> this is also why I think that you should produce the patch you
> actually want instead of letting other people repeatedly submit
> patches and then complain that they weren't what you had in mind.
OK, Corey hasn't said anything, so I will have a look at this over
the weekend.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-12-02 14:18:57 | Re: pg_dump: Remove "blob" terminology |
| Previous Message | Israel Barth Rubio | 2022-12-02 14:11:28 | Re: Add support for DEFAULT specification in COPY FROM |