Re: Vacuum (table performance)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Claudio Lapidus" <clapidus(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum (table performance)
Date: 2003-06-25 23:27:34
Message-ID: 19228.1056583654@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Claudio Lapidus" <clapidus(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Does a REINDEX of the table fix it?

> Hmm, I'm looking at the documentation and it says that REINDEX acquires an
> exclusive lock on the table. Does this mean that during the reindex
> operation the table is unavailable for read/write by other processes?

Yes. At the moment, I am just asking this as a means of helping to
pinpoint where the problem is.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Lapidus 2003-06-26 00:01:51 Re: Vacuum (table performance)
Previous Message MT 2003-06-25 23:24:06 selecting the record before the last one