Re: regression failures - further data

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regression failures - further data
Date: 2004-05-07 01:54:37
Message-ID: 1922.24.211.141.25.1083894877.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Tom Lane said:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> No, this is running with the patch that suppresses that. Basically,
>> for some reason that I have been unable to find, and which leaves no
>> log trace, copy just stops after about 4 or 5 lines, and then there
>> are a bunch of consequent failures. I can't account for it yet. All I
>> do know is that it happens when the tests are run with high
>> parallelism and doesn't with no or low parallelism.
>
> That seems *really weird*. When you say "stops after 4 or 5 lines", do
> you mean that the first few rows of the source data get committed
> successfully, but the rest don't?
>

Er, no :-) I mean the first few lines of source code ... around where it
does the "delete from onek". It's not entirely consistent. I'm playing
with debugging etc. in the postmaster log to get further and better
particulars.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-07 02:32:50 Re: regression failures - further data
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-07 01:12:11 Re: regression failures - further data