From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Exponential notation bug |
Date: | 2025-04-04 16:17:52 |
Message-ID: | 1911853.1743783472@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This seems like a question for -general or some other user-focused
> mailing list, not hackers. At any rate, I don't see how 1e4 could just
> be "ignored", but as Maciek points out, 1e4 and 10000 are of different
> data types, which seems likely to be relevant somehow.
I am also wondering about careless whitespace.
postgres=# select 9/1e1;
?column?
------------------------
0.90000000000000000000
(1 row)
postgres=# select 9/1 e1;
e1
----
9
(1 row)
In any case, I tried copying-and-pasting parts of the originally
mentioned query, and I saw nothing that looked like misbehavior.
Please show an exact, self-contained test case if you want us
to believe there's a bug here.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-04-04 16:19:46 | Re: New criteria for autovacuum |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-04-04 16:17:19 | Re: autoprewarm_dump_now |