From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4 |
Date: | 2004-07-26 05:16:00 |
Message-ID: | 19106.1090818960@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> Please find attached another new version of a patch which provides a
>> working infrastructure for pg extensions.
> This patch breaks building outside the source tree in a very elaborate
> and obvious way. Unfortunately, this is all tied together so I haven't
> figured out yet if it can be fixed easily.
Peter, do you have time before the end of the month to sort this out?
It would be nice to have a real solution in this area, because certainly
we have some problems here.
> I think by now I'm looking for a patch that does not
> touch contrib at all (except perhaps contrib-global.mk).
I would think that we'd want to make the contrib tree use whatever
solution is developed for building outside the main source tree, simply
because that's a handy test case for verifying that it's not broken.
I won't commit hara-kiri if this is not solved for 7.5, but it is an
open issue, especially for RPM and similar package installations.
If Fabien's work is at all close to a usable solution, it'd be a shame
not to get it done in this release cycle.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-07-26 05:26:37 | Weird...but correct? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-26 05:06:56 | Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-07-26 07:58:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-26 04:36:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend |