Re: bit string functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bit string functions
Date: 2007-07-16 19:43:07
Message-ID: 19094.1184614987@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> writes:
>> I would say just set up a project on pgfoundry.

> I agree, though I think in the long term we do need a more complete set of
> operators and functions in core.

Considering that BIT and BIT VARYING have been removed entirely from
SQL:2003, it seems unlikely to me that we should expend our limited
resources in that particular direction.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-07-16 20:02:17 Re: SSPI authentication
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-07-16 19:20:09 Re: bit string functions