| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Contrib docs v1 |
| Date: | 2007-11-11 15:42:17 |
| Message-ID: | 19053.1194795737@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, don't start converting them yet. I now realize that
> /contrib/dict_int is an example and just like the stuff in /contrib/spi
> perhaps shouldn't have its docs moved to SGML.
What makes you realize any such thing? You could make that argument for
test_parser, probably, but the dict modules are useful in their own
right.
> Should we leave example /contrib modules documented in READMEs?
What is the point of such a distinction?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-11 18:16:39 | Re: [PATCHES] Contrib docs v1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-11 14:55:05 | Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-11 18:16:39 | Re: [PATCHES] Contrib docs v1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-11 14:28:24 | Re: [PATCHES] Contrib docs v1 |