Re: Commitfest status

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Since there are 19 pages and probably less than 19 interested hackers,
>> maybe we could just each take a page of the list as it stands and go
>> through it at that level? Although many of the threads cross pages, so
>> that's not ideal. Any other ideas?

> The problem is that as they are deleted, they will move. Perhaps I can
> just comment on them to close them and not delete anything.

Ah, right. And the other problem is additions of new messages to
threads. So the page boundaries can't be expected to stay stable for
long.

The comment thing is kinda cool, but I don't feel very comfortable about
using the comments for anything substantive. Actual reviews of patches,
for example, need to still be sent on the mailing lists so that they'll
go into the archives. I suggest we just use the comments for status
annotations, like "done" or "no patch here, make a TODO" or "needs
review, I will review".

regards, tom lane