From: | "FERREIRA William (COFRAMI)" <william(dot)ferreira(at)airbus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Michael Fuhr' <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Move cursor |
Date: | 2005-03-09 08:18:42 |
Message-ID: | 1904E3EB39448246A7ECB76DF34A70B00143B475@TOCOMEXC03 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
does i hope that CURSOR will be fully implemented soon ?
(or maybe you know an alternative for my problem ? :) )
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Michael Fuhr [mailto:mike(at)fuhr(dot)org]
Envoyé : mardi 8 mars 2005 18:29
À : Tom Lane
Cc : FERREIRA William (COFRAMI); pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Objet : Re: [GENERAL] Move cursor
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:16:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> > I don't think PL/pgSQL implements cursors fully.
>
> Its cursor facility is certainly far weaker than what's presently in the
> main SQL language. I think this is at least partly historical accident
> (ie we upgraded the main language and forgot about plpgsql).
Would adding MOVE to PL/pgSQL be a fairly trivial effort? If so
then I'd consider having a go at it myself, unless it's something
somebody else could bang out in five minutes (and was willing to
do so).
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-03-09 08:23:45 | Re: Can't delete - Need cascading update instead |
Previous Message | tony | 2005-03-09 07:26:59 | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |