Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew Nuzum" <cobalt(at)bearfruit(dot)org>
Cc: "'Andrew Sullivan'" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
Date: 2003-07-07 13:30:43
Message-ID: 19041.1057584643@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Matthew Nuzum" <cobalt(at)bearfruit(dot)org> writes:
> Are you willing to say that the PostgreSQL database system should only be
> used by DBAs? I believe that Postgres is such a good and useful tool that
> anyone should be able to start using it with little or no barrier to entry.

I quite agree. But there is a difference between saying "you should get
decent performance with no effort" and "you should get optimal
performance with no effort". I think we can get to the first with
relatively little trouble (like boosting the default shared_buffers to
1000), but the second is an impractical goal.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Boes 2003-07-07 14:17:35 Optimizer differences between 7.2 and 7.3
Previous Message Michael Mattox 2003-07-07 13:23:40 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...