Re: [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4
Date: 2017-06-01 21:41:25
Message-ID: 19039.1496353285@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> writes:
> On 05/31/2017 11:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, I grant your point that some extensions may have outside
>> constraints that mandate using -Wconversion, so to the extent that
>> we can keep key headers like postgres.h from triggering those warnings,
>> it's probably worth doing. I suspect you're still seeing a lot of them
>> though --- experiments with some contrib modules suggest that a lot of
>> our other headers also contain code that would trigger them. I do not
>> think I'd be on board with trying to silence them generally.

> That was actually the only one PL/Java gets, outside of /sign/
> conversions, a special subset of conversion warnings that can be
> separately turned off with -Wno-sign-conversion.

Just for the archives' sake: I experimented with this, using Fedora 25's
compiler (gcc version 6.3.1) against current HEAD (including your patch).
For the core build only, no contrib, I see:

12169 warnings generated by -Wconversion

4106 warnings generated by -Wconversion -Wno-sign-conversion

It's not just the core code that has issues either: contrib has 2202
warnings for the first case, 683 for the second.

So it's better with -Wno-sign-conversion, but I'd say we're still not
going there anytime soon.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2017-06-01 21:45:29 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-06-01 21:27:08 Re: strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings