Re: pg_listening_channels()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_listening_channels()
Date: 2012-11-28 23:13:00
Message-ID: 19018.1354144380@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com> writes:
> With PG 9.0 changes I lost ability to check if anyone is interested in the NOTIFY signal and payload I'm about to send.
> Seems like this change was not thought through completely.

[ shrug... ] It was debated extensively and the advantages of the new
implementation were deemed to outweigh the disadvantages.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Seref Arikan 2012-11-28 23:23:02 Re: create table in memory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-11-28 22:50:15 Re: 'alternatives'