| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index? |
| Date: | 2018-10-24 08:33:48 |
| Message-ID: | 19003.1540370028@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> While reloading a database cluster to move from 10.5 to 11, I'm getting
> out of memory crashes that I did see when doing reloads on pg 10.
> The statement flagged in the log is this:
> 2018-10-23 16:44:34.815 CDT [126839] STATEMENT: ALTER TABLE ONLY public.iplocation
> ADD CONSTRAINT overlap EXCLUDE USING spgist (network WITH &&);
Hm, there's a fair amount of new code in SP-GIST in v11, so maybe you've
hit a memory leak in that. Can you create a self-contained test case?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2018-10-24 08:37:48 | Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index? |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Schneider | 2018-10-24 08:15:29 | Re: Oracle vs PG |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2018-10-24 08:34:47 | Re: Side effect of CVE-2017-7484 fix? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-24 08:08:22 | Re: Unordered wait event ClogGroupUpdate |