| From: | Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David Rowley" <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support tid range scan in parallel? |
| Date: | 2024-05-09 17:16:32 |
| Message-ID: | 18f5e5b4a6c.113b28c80294037.6198733288700064028@highgo.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I've not looked at the patch, but please add it to the July CF. I'll
> try and look in more detail then.
Thanks David, I have added this patch on July commitfest under the
server feature category.
I understand that the regression tests for parallel ctid range scan is a
bit lacking now. It only has a few EXPLAIN clauses to ensure parallel
workers are used when tid ranges are specified. They are added as
part of select_parallel.sql test. I am not sure if it is more appropriate
to have them as part of tidrangescan.sql test instead. So basically
re-run the same test cases in tidrangescan.sql but in parallel?
thank you
Cary
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-05-09 17:21:00 | Re: [PATCH] json_lex_string: don't overread on bad UTF8 |
| Previous Message | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker | 2024-05-09 16:42:15 | Re: Is there an undocumented Syntax Check in Meson? |