Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2021-06-03 20:58:17
Message-ID: 18F25D44-347C-45FE-9E90-A057547A2200@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 3 Jun 2021, at 22:55, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>>> Also, do we have precedent for GUC aliases? That might be a little
>>> weird.
>
>> I don't think we do currently, but I have a feeling the topic has surfaced here
>> before.
>
> We do, look for "sort_mem" in guc.c.

I knew it seemed familiar but I failed to find it, thanks for the pointer.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-06-03 21:06:42 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-06-03 20:57:38 Re: PATCH: generate fractional cheapest paths in generate_orderedappend_path