Re: Open issues for HOT patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open issues for HOT patch
Date: 2007-09-19 13:08:09
Message-ID: 18984.1190207289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> 3 isn't that important to me, but 4 is:
> 4. Doesn't hammer the database to measure

> And pgstattuple fails #4 miserably. Want to know the average dead space
> in a 500GB database? Yeah, right....

So we could put a vacuum_cost_delay() in it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-19 14:37:30 Re: Dynamically adding index types (was GIT indexes)
Previous Message Radosław Zieliński 2007-09-19 10:07:29 Re: pg_ctl -w vs unix_socket_directory