From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Maldonado <jmaldonado(at)webehosting(dot)biz> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TRUNCATE locking problem |
Date: | 2005-07-21 14:08:37 |
Message-ID: | 18982.1121954917@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joe Maldonado <jmaldonado(at)webehosting(dot)biz> writes:
> While researching this locking issue I got some of the logs and found
> that in one of the cases there was a SELECT running for a long time,
> about 2 hours. This select statement does not usually take more than a
> few seconds though, it appeared that TRUNCATE was waiting on it to
> finish before continuing.
> The SELECT statement in question contains a sub SELECT in the FROM
> clause which in turn is joining with a view that contains the table
> which TRUNCATE is being executed against.
> Is it possible that the SELECT was issues just before the TRUNCATE
> statement was issues and the view in the sub SELECT was waiting on
> TRUNCATE's lock?
No. That would be a deadlock and would be reported as such.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Maldonado | 2005-07-21 14:15:07 | Re: TRUNCATE locking problem |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-07-21 14:00:49 | Re: Wishlist? |