From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | John Vincent <pgsql-performance(at)lusis(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: scaling up postgres |
Date: | 2006-06-14 02:24:41 |
Message-ID: | 18926.1150251881@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:21:21PM -0400, John Vincent wrote:
>> Actually it's on my radar. I was looking for a precompiled build first (we
>> actually checked the Pervasive and Bizgres sites first since we're
>> considering a support contract) before going the self-compiled route. When I
>> didn't see a pre-compiled build available, I started looking at the
>> developer archives and got a little worried that I wouldn't want to base my
>> job on a self-built Postgres on a fairly new (I'd consider Power 5 fairly
>> new) platform.
> Well, pre-compiled isn't going to make much of a difference
> stability-wise. What you will run into is that very few people are
> running PostgreSQL on your hardware, so it's possible you'd run into
> some odd corner cases.
Power 5 is just a PPC64 platform isn't it? Red Hat's been building PG
for PPC64 for years, and I've not heard any problems reported. Now,
if you're using a non-gcc compiler then maybe that track record doesn't
carry over to whatever you are using ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-14 02:44:29 | Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-14 02:13:24 | Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 |