Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
To: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date: 2020-01-10 13:06:26
Message-ID: 18921481578661586@sas1-0ef7a84b6a92.qloud-c.yandex.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

> Yes, we should improve this. I tried to fix this. Attaching a delta
> patch that is fixing both the comments.

Thank you, I have no objections.

I think that status of CF entry is outdated and the most appropriate status for this patch is "Ready to Commiter". Changed. I also added an annotation with a link to recently summarized results.

regards, Sergei

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-01-10 13:41:06 Re: our checks for read-only queries are not great
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-01-10 12:29:56 Re: Fixing parallel make of libpq