Re: PGP signing releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases
Date: 2003-02-03 00:55:32
Message-ID: 18917.1044233732@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> I think we should PGP sign all the "official" packages that are provided
> for download from the various mirror sites.

This is probably a good idea.

> I'd volunteer to do the work myself, except that it's pretty closely
> intertwined with the release process itself...

Marc would have to be the guy who actually generates the tarball
signatures. But you could possibly help him get the procedure set up,
if he's not familiar with it already...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-03 00:56:26 Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it to work?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-03 00:52:34 Re: pg_hba.conf hostmask.