Re: One process per session lack of sharing

From: AMatveev(at)bitec(dot)ru
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One process per session lack of sharing
Date: 2016-07-15 12:54:50
Message-ID: 1891322107.20160715155450@bitec.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

> but parallel processing doesn't requires threading support - see PostgreSQL 9.6 features.

To share dynamic execution code between threads much more easy(If sharing this code between process is possible).
There is many other interaction techniques between threads which is
absence between process.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-07-15 12:55:45 Re: Oddity in handling of cached plans for FDW queries
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-07-15 11:55:32 Re: One process per session lack of sharing