Re: MySQL versus Postgres

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MySQL versus Postgres
Date: 2010-08-12 01:43:05
Message-ID: 1890.1281577385@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net> writes:
> It's a matter of correctness: I see PG as a high
> performance database system. Allowing to start it in awfully suboptimal
> conditions it's no different from allowing '0000-00-00' as a date: it
> may give you the idea you did the right thing, but most of the time you
> didn't.

Unfortunately, there are quite a few of us for whom "correctness"
doesn't mean "automatically try to eat all the resources available".
Your view of what is useful behavior is far too narrow-minded ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-12 01:58:02 Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-08-12 01:32:11 Re: deadlock