| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Nic Ferrier" <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| Date: | 2001-02-06 00:39:24 |
| Message-ID: | 18892.981419964@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
"Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> "Nic Ferrier" wrote:
>>>> - the postmaster was being started without nohup
> If postmaster is being started by init, it should not need nohup, because
> init never exits and postmaster is not going to get shutdown unexpectedly.
On the other hand, when pg_ctl is invoked by hand, it probably is a bug
that it fails to use nohup. Perhaps this is a reason why pg_ctl should
not be made into a substitute for a startup script?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nic Ferrier | 2001-02-06 00:58:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2001-02-05 22:56:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nic Ferrier | 2001-02-06 00:58:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| Previous Message | Derek Young-ADSL | 2001-02-05 23:12:47 | Re: TODO list: Allow Java server-side programming |