| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | fuerst(dot)thomas(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Typo on 2.3. PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2024-08-21 21:33:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1888413.1724276011@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/history.html#HISTORY-POSTGRESQL,
> Chapter 2.3. PostgreSQL is written in first sentence: "By 1996, it became
> clear that the name “Postgres95” would not stand the test of time."
> I think there should be "the rest of time" instead of "the test of time"
It's correct as-is --- that's a pretty standard idiom in English.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | yanliang lei | 2024-08-21 23:40:44 | Re:Re: Supplements and suggestions and about postgresql sequence setval function in the documents |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2024-08-21 15:55:42 | Rsync access to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/ ? |