Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD
Date: 2019-01-17 23:11:20
Message-ID: 18884.1547766680@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu> writes:
>> But it looks like in NetBSD the options are called:

Sorry about that, I copied-and-pasted from the openbsd machine I was
looking at without remembering that netbsd is just a shade different.

> but the OpenBSD machine went further and now fails on:
> pgbenchCheck instead.
> Is that the failure you expected to get?

Yup, sure is. Thanks!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-17 23:20:51 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Previous Message Mikael Kjellström 2019-01-17 23:10:01 Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD