Re: Index AM API cleanup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alex Wang <alex(dot)wang(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Index AM API cleanup
Date: 2024-08-21 21:25:42
Message-ID: 1887432.1724275542@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On Aug 21, 2024, at 12:34 PM, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi! Why is the patch attached as .tar.bz2? Usually raw patches are sent here...

> I worried the patch set, being greater than 1 MB, might bounce or be held up in moderation.

I'm +1 for doing it like this with such a large group of patches.
Separate attachments are nice up to say half a dozen attachments,
but beyond that they're kind of a pain to deal with.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-08-21 22:00:46 Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-08-21 21:03:31 Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions