Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-20 16:54:35
Message-ID: 18832.1056128075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> So looked at from that perspective, our mistake was to try to cram too many
> features into 7.4 ... more than could possibly get done in 6-8 months.

It's more that we thought that all these features would get done in
about the same timeframe, and (not too surprisingly) some got done and
some didn't.

> Me, I'd be in favor of releasing more frequently ... I felt that we
> waited too long for 7.4.

Yeah, this is why I'm not in favor of slipping more.

Time was that we had a major release every 3 or 4 months. As the project
matures I think it's appropriate for the cycle to get slower: a lot of
low-hanging fruit is gone, so we have larger jobs to tackle, plus users
are using PG for larger databases and don't want to face major-version
changes too often. But I don't want it to get to be a year on average
between releases, at least not yet. 8 or 9 months seems reasonable, and
by that standard we're overdue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-20 17:01:14 Re: [HACKERS] psql
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-20 16:34:58 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze