From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Date: | 2003-06-20 16:54:35 |
Message-ID: | 18832.1056128075@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> So looked at from that perspective, our mistake was to try to cram too many
> features into 7.4 ... more than could possibly get done in 6-8 months.
It's more that we thought that all these features would get done in
about the same timeframe, and (not too surprisingly) some got done and
some didn't.
> Me, I'd be in favor of releasing more frequently ... I felt that we
> waited too long for 7.4.
Yeah, this is why I'm not in favor of slipping more.
Time was that we had a major release every 3 or 4 months. As the project
matures I think it's appropriate for the cycle to get slower: a lot of
low-hanging fruit is gone, so we have larger jobs to tackle, plus users
are using PG for larger databases and don't want to face major-version
changes too often. But I don't want it to get to be a year on average
between releases, at least not yet. 8 or 9 months seems reasonable, and
by that standard we're overdue.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-20 17:01:14 | Re: [HACKERS] psql |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-06-20 16:34:58 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |