| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Making pg_config and pg_controldata output available via SQL |
| Date: | 2010-02-03 19:32:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1883.1265225567@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'd really like to see the data from pg_config and pg_controldata available
> through SQL, such as by adding output to pg_show_all_settings(), or adding new
> SRFs named something like pg_config() and pg_controldata(). Does this make as
> much sense to the rest of the world as it does to me? In particular it's
> useful to be able to find $libdir without requiring pg_config, as some
> packagers tend not to include it in anything put the -dev packages, but all
> those settings seem useful to have on hand, and in at least most cases
> shouldn't be tough to expose via SQL. Comments?
I wonder whether there's a security issue there. Telling an attacker
whether you've been built with feature X seems like possibly useful
info that he couldn't otherwise get without local machine access.
In particular, we already try to avoid exposing server filesystem
path information.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-02-03 19:33:14 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
| Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2010-02-03 19:30:15 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |