Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.4 items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.4 items
Date: 2003-10-06 02:41:52
Message-ID: 18824.1065408112@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> (BTW, is there a reason the docs consistently call them "B-tree
> indexes", not "B+-tree indexes"?)

The latter might be technically more correct, but most people are going
to think it's a typo. I think B-tree is fine for the purposes of our docs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-10-06 02:43:08 Re: LOCK.tag(figuring out granularity of lock)
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-06 01:41:52 Re: Day of week question

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-06 03:44:49 Re: Make psql use all pretty print options
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-10-06 01:47:44 spanish translation updates