Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Date: 2010-11-24 15:34:52
Message-ID: 18823.1290612892@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I also want to propose to make it possible dump function definitions
> as CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION rather than just CREATE
> FUNCTION (as pg_dump dumps them now).

It's intentional that pg_dump doesn't do that. Please don't think
that pg_dump is a substitute for \ef.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-24 15:45:28 Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-24 15:33:02 Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array