From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | hgonzalez(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] psql weird behaviour with charset encodings |
Date: | 2010-05-09 01:24:45 |
Message-ID: | 18815.1273368285@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
hgonzalez(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=649
> The last explains why they do not consider it a bug:
> ISO C99 requires for %.*s to only write complete characters that fit below
> the
> precision number of bytes. If you are using say UTF-8 locale, but ISO-8859-1
> characters as shown in the input file you provided, some of the strings are
> not valid UTF-8 strings, therefore sprintf fails with -1 because of the
> encoding error. That's not a bug in glibc.
Yeah, that was about the position I thought they'd take.
So the bottom line here is that we're best off to avoid %.*s because
it may fail if the string contains data that isn't validly encoded
according to libc's idea of the prevailing encoding. I think that
means the patch I committed earlier is still a good idea, but the
comments need a bit of adjustment. Will fix.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-09 02:19:08 | Re: psql weird behaviour with charset encodings |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-09 01:03:41 | Re: Query that produces index information for a Table |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-09 02:19:08 | Re: psql weird behaviour with charset encodings |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-09 00:57:26 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |