Streaming Replication 9.2

From: David Greco <David_Greco(at)harte-hanks(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Streaming Replication 9.2
Date: 2013-04-11 14:51:37
Message-ID: 187F6C10D2931A4386EE8E58E13857F6303AC41F@BY2PRD0811MB415.namprd08.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I've setup streaming replication between two 9.2 servers, and have a few concerns/questions. I set it up with a very large wal_keep_segments, 17000, and do NOT ship the logs to the standby.

When I failover to the slave, MUST the process for bringing back up the former master initially as a slave involve copying a base backup from the new master back to the former master? Even if I am keeping enough wal segments to include all changes since the former slave was promoted? I tried just bringing up the former master as a slave but it complains "timeline 2 of the primary does not match recovery target timeline 1".

If this is true, what is a good strategy for handling primary/slave in distant geographic locations where copying a base backup between the two is not terribly convenient?

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ledwabakg 2013-04-11 15:06:01 Re: UPDATE .. JOIN?
Previous Message Matthew Churcher 2013-04-11 14:40:32 Cost of initiating cursors