| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Steven Flatt" <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #3883: Autovacuum deadlock with truncate? |
| Date: | 2008-01-18 01:19:53 |
| Message-ID: | 18742.1200619193@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Steven Flatt" <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 1/17/08, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> What I think might be happening is a three-way deadlock involving these
>> two and a third process that has the desired buffer lock. Have you got
>> anything else that seems to be stuck?
> Don't see a third process that is stuck...
Hmm. The only other theory I can think of is that some process forgot
about a buffer pin it was holding, or the wakeup signal to release the
autovac process somehow got lost; either of which would be significant
bugs.
Do you still have the hung processes available? It would be really
useful to take a look at the buffer header that the autovac process's
LockBufferForCleanup() is working on. (In gdb, "f 3" then "p *bufHdr")
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Russell Smith | 2008-01-18 08:59:42 | Re: Minor mathematical error in documentation |
| Previous Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2008-01-17 23:52:33 | Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal |