Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly
Date: 2008-03-14 16:04:09
Message-ID: 18740.1205510649@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> How about this other patch?

That's really, really ugly. I'd rather see the flag passed down to
vacuum_rel as a regular function argument. I realize you'll need
to touch the signatures of a couple of levels of functions to do that,
but a global variable for this seems just dangerous.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-14 16:09:55 Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly
Previous Message Zubkovsky, Sergey 2008-03-14 15:23:22 Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT