| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
| Date: | 2010-02-22 21:24:54 |
| Message-ID: | 1874.1266873894@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just reading up on this interesting thread. WFIW, 2 years ago I and a
> collegue of mine did a hardware comparison of early Intel and AMD
> desktop quadcore processors to run postgres database, with most other
> parts comparable. The intel processor was 20 to 30 % faster in cpu
> operations to the (first generation) Phenom at almost everything, except
> at index creation. The test that the AMD finished in a few minutes, we
> had to stop on the Intel because it simply didn't finish. We double
> checked configuration settings and could not find explainable
> differences. I hesitate to post this information here, because its hard
> to believe that an actual big difference between the processors exists,
> and it more likely was something in our test setup. Still: the
> difference was *only* in index creation, which is kindoff like a qsort yes?
Interesting. Yes, btree index creation is essentially a sort ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Neyman | 2010-02-22 22:31:58 | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Yang Zhang | 2010-02-22 20:55:54 | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |