Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about
Date: 2002-08-30 19:38:29
Message-ID: 18712.1030736309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> On second thought, *all* functions failing is what you expected, right
>> Tom?

Yeah. I coulda sworn I tested pg_settings yesterday after making those
other changes, but I must not have; it's sure failing for me today.

> Here is a patch with the above mentioned fix. It also has an addition to
> rangefuncs.sql and rangefuncs.out to ensure a C language table function
> gets tested.

Good idea. Will apply.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gordon Runkle 2002-08-30 19:43:03 [7.3-devl] initdb fails on RH 7.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-30 19:29:45 Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-30 20:18:30 Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-30 19:29:45 Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?