Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL
Date: 2021-01-06 13:27:03
Message-ID: 1870277b-9fd2-a19b-5797-1bb035a35cba@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/01/2021 13:42, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 03:13:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> At the same time, I have taken care of your comment from upthread to
>> return a failure if the caller passes NULL for the context, and
>> adjusted some comments. What do you think of the attached?
>
> I have looked again at this thread with a fresher mind and I did not
> see a problem with the previous patch, except some indentation
> issues. So if there are no objections, I'd like to commit the
> attached.

Looks fine to me.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2021-01-06 13:58:22 Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL
Previous Message k.jamison@fujitsu.com 2021-01-06 13:13:03 RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist