Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c
Date: 2006-09-20 20:49:01
Message-ID: 18671.1158785341@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Strangely, if I try to do a "cvs add gram.c", it fails with
> cvs add: `gram.c' added independently by second party
> I don't know what this means. (Why "second party" and not "third
> party"?). Even if I delete gram.c. Even if I remove it from
> .cvsignore.

I think "cvs add" probably contacts the server, because I seem to recall
that it gives different output depending on whether the file already
exists on another branch, and there's no way to tell that from your
local working directory contents.

The CVS history for gram.c looks a bit confused:
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/parser/Attic/gram.c
How did revisions 2.89 and 2.90 come into existence when the file was
already cvs-removed? This may be confusing the server too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-20 21:01:53 Re: TODO: Fix CREATE CAST on DOMAINs
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-09-20 20:48:38 Re: TODO: Fix CREATE CAST on DOMAINs

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-09-20 21:44:32 Re: [HACKERS] Incrementally Updated Backup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-20 20:26:30 Re: [HACKERS] Incrementally Updated Backup