From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: adjust chr()/ascii() to prevent invalidly encoded data |
Date: | 2007-09-21 02:02:12 |
Message-ID: | 18664.1190340132@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm, is this what we had agreed? I'm not sure I like it; if I'm using
> chr() to produce characters, then the application is going to have to
> worry about server_encoding in order to find the correct parameter to
> pass to chr().
That's always been the case.
> What I thought was the idea is that chr() always gets an Unicode code
> point, and it converts the character to the server_encoding.
I think that would be too big a break from past practice --- the
operative word being "break", because in LATINn character sets chr/ascii
work just fine.
I wouldn't object to introducing some sort of unicode_chr/unicode_ascii
function pair that translates to/from Unicode code points regardless of
the DB encoding. But that smells way more like a new feature than
plugging a hole, so I suggest it should wait for 8.4.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-09-21 02:05:47 | ecpg PREPARE is not thread safe |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-21 01:27:57 | Re: [PATCHES] Patch to update log levels |