| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Date: | 2017-08-17 18:52:22 |
| Message-ID: | 18650.1502995942@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Nope, spoke too soon. See buildfarm.
> Whoa, that's not good.
Ah-hah, I see my dromedary box is one of the ones failing, so I'll
have a look there. I can't reproduce it on my other machines.
I'm a bit suspicious that it's got something to do with getting
a different number of workers during restart. Whether that's
the issue or not, though, it sure seems like a rescan leaks an
unpleasantly large amount of memory. I wonder if we shouldn't
refactor this so that the per-reader structs can be reused.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-17 22:20:16 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-17 18:14:16 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-17 18:55:49 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2017-08-17 18:35:52 | Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior |