Re: Using a table's data type...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "murphy pope" <pope_murphy(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using a table's data type...
Date: 2002-05-05 23:25:50
Message-ID: 18648.1020641150@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"murphy pope" <pope_murphy(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe the fact that I can use a table's type to define a column is
> just accidental and I really shouldn't do that.

It did actually do something quasi-useful, I believe, back in the
PostQUEL days. But it hasn't worked for a long time, and I don't think
there's any interest in reviving it. Some day we should deliver the
coup de grace and get rid of 'attisset' completely.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesus Contreras 2002-05-06 09:45:07 [POSTGRESQL] LOCKING A ROW
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-05-05 23:15:09 Re: Using views and MS access via odbc